Nabugabo Wetland

UGATIPA24
Nabugabo Wetland

Country: Uganda

Administrative region: Central (Region)

Central co-ordinates: 0.40018 S, 31.88889 E

Area: 219km²

Qualifying IPA Criteria

A(i)Site contains one or more globally threatened species, C(iii)Site contains nationally threatened or restricted habitat or vegetation types, AND/OR habitats that have severely declined in extent nationally

IPA assessment rationale

Nabugabo qualifies as an Important Plant Area under criterion A; sub-criterion A(i) is triggered by the presence of one Critically Endangered species (Senecio navagabensis), five Endangered species (Agelanthus entebbensis, Emilia cryptantha, Oldenlandia duemmeri, Vernonia tinctosetosa and Xyris ednae) and one Vulnerable species (Englerina schubotziana). Both Senecio navabagensis and Xyris ednae are endemic to Nabugabo, not known from anywhere else in the world. It also qualifies under criterion B(ii) as it is among the top 13 richest sites for endemic taxa.

The site is also one of the five best freshwater marshes nationally. This habitat is nationally Vulnerable and has been heavily exploited elsewhere in Uganda, therefore conservation of the freshwater marshes at this site is of national importance.

Site description

The Nabugabo Important Plant Area (IPA) covers an area of 219 km2 and is situated about 100 km southwest of Kampala in Central Uganda, Floristic region U4, on the western shores of Lake Victoria in Masaka district. Lake Nabugabo is separated from Lake Victoria by Lwamunda wetland and a sand bar c. 2 km wide (Ramsar Site Information Service 2024) of 4,000 (Johnsson et al. 2000, Danley et al. 2012) or even possibly 5,000 (Stager et al. 2005) years in age. The altitude ranges from 1,135 to 1,185 m asl. The Nabugabo IPA overlaps with the Lake Nabugabo wetland system Ramsar site (Ramsar Sites Information Service 2024; MWE 2017).

Nabugabo IPA is a mosaic of habitats with vegetation comprising both wet and dry grasslands. This site was surveyed in 2023 as part of fieldwork for the Uganda TIPAs project.

Botanical significance

Nabugabo IPA was found to have the highest biodiversity ranking of the 93 wetland sites surveyed by the Uganda Wetland Biodiversity Study of 1996 based on plants, dragonflies, birds and fish (MWE 1996; Mafabi 2003). This IPA is botanically important, being home to a diverse flora of not less than 304 species of vascular plants reported (Kalema 2005a, 2005b). It has a number of plants that are rare, making it unique and has an appreciable complementarity to the other wetland ecosystems in Uganda (Kalema 2005b).

The IPA has two species of flowering plants not known elsewhere in the world, i.e., Xyris ednae (Xyridaceae) and Senecio navugabensis (Asteraceae). Senecio navugabensis is known only from the type collection from 1935 (Synge #1947). Known from the swamp edge, good habitat may still exist for this species. However, many threats to the site including grazing and associated burning, alongside tourism and its use for military training, have led to this species being assessed as Critically Endangered - Possibly Extinct (IUCN SSC EAPRLA 2013). This species was not observed during October 2023 TIPAs fieldwork at the site, but the only known specimen was collected in flower in April, and so the flowering period may be limited to earlier in the year.

Xyris ednae is an Endangered herb species with a range that extends from the western Lake Nabugabo shores toward Kitovu near Masaka. The sites nearest Masaka are thought to be most threatened, with some populations likely lost (Beentje et al. 2019).

Alongside X. ednae, there are four other Endangered species known from this IPA. These include two herbaceous Asteraceae, Emilia cryptantha and Vernonia tinctosetosa. Emilia cryptantha is near-endemic, limited to swampy grassland in S Uganda and NW Tanzania. It is thought to have been extirpated from some areas, including Kabaka’s Lake, Kampala (Gereau et al. 2016). This species was collected most recently in 2001 at Nabugabo (Kalema #1109, 1173); this IPA is therefore important for conservation of this Endangered species. Vernonia tinctosetosa is similarly near-endemic, known only from Nabugabo and NW Tanzania. Nabugabo IPA is one of the most important sites for another Endangered species, Oldenlandia duemmeri. This woody herb in the Rubiaceae is only known from seasonally wet grassland in Nabugabo and a few other localities in the Central region of Uganda and the east of Rwanda. During 2023 Uganda TIPAs fieldwork, O. duemmeri was observed to be common in the grassland on the northwestern shore of Lake Nabugabo. Agelanthus entebbensis (Loranthaceae), also Endangered, is a hemiparasitic forest shrub only known from western Kenya to Nabugabo.

One Vulnerable species, the parasitic Englerina schubotziana (Loranthaceae), is known from Nabugabo. This IPA is likely the easternmost locality for this species which is largely restricted to the Albertine Rift (Gereau et al. 2019).

A total of 10 species of plants are known exclusively from Nabugabo and nowhere else in Uganda (Lye and Namaganda 2005), viz: Andropogon eucomus subsp. huillensis (A. laxatus), Blyxa aubertii, Drosera burkeana, Eriochrysis pallida, Heteranthoecia guineensis, Sauvagesia africana, Tricanthecium (Panicum) brazzavillense, Utricularia benjaminiana, Wiesneria filifolia, and Xyris subtilis.

Seven other species occur in Nabugabo but with very few (three or fewer) extra localities elsewhere in the country. For instance, Brasenia schreberi was previously recorded from Kabaka’s lake in Kampala and Namanve swamp in Mukono District and recently at Mabamba Bay wetland (M. Namaganda, pers. comm. 2025). As well, Nervilia petraea has also been recorded from near Masaka and Kabaka’s lake in Kampala. Nymphoides indica is only known from Nabugabo and Kaku-Kiyanja wetland in Lyantonde district (M. Namaganda, pers. comm. 2025), and Syngonanthus wahlbergii is also known from Entebbe and Mabamba. Trichopteryx marungensis also occurs in Bukakata, which is very close to Nabugabo geographically, Utricularia pubescens is also recorded from Rakai, and Xyris angularis has also been recorded from Jubiya Central Forest Reserve. The Nabugabo IPA is the most important area for the conservation of carnivorous plants in Uganda (Kalema et al 2016); it has 13 of the 23 Ugandan species of carnivorous plants and 2.2% of the world’s carnivorous plant diversity (Namaganda, 2005).

This site has a rich desmid flora (an order of green algae) with 108 taxa identified, 14 of which are mostly known only from the African continent (van Geest and Coesel 2012). Six of these desmids are newly described: Euastrum gemmatum var. quadrituberosum, Micrasterias stuhlmannii var. nabugabonum, Cosmarium nabugabonum, Xanthidium thomassonii, Staurodesmus eckertii var. africanus and Staurastrum capitulum var. foersteri.

Aside from species richness, Nabugabo IPA is a nationally important example of freshwater marsh habitat (VU). This habitat is important in the provision of ecosystem services (see Key Ecosystem Services) but is threatened nationally, particularly due to expanding agriculture (Wambede 2021; Richards et al. 2024). Nabugabo is one the most intact examples of this habitat nationally and therefore triggers sub-criterion C(iii) of the IPA criteria.

Habitat and geology

The wetland habitats comprise areas of open freshwater as well as both permanent and intermittent freshwater marshes and pools. These wetland habitats are predominantly of Miscanthidium (Miscanthus) violaceum, Loudetia phragmitoides, Eriochrysis brachypogon and Limnophyton obtusifolium marshes, with peaty bogs at the edges between marshes, and grasslands with Loudetia kagerensis, Andropogon canaliculatus, Hyparrhenia spp. and Eragrostis spp., are also common. Parinari curatellifolia forms occasional near-pure patchy stands on sandy soils in grassland. There are vast Sphagnum boggy swamps with frequent occurrence of Rhynchospora sp. and Eriocaulon schimperi.

There is a forest along the north-western shore and sandy beaches along the windward, eastern shoreline, with other smaller relics in other places. Common species in the forest are Xylopia aethiopica, Beilschmiedia ugandensis, Synsepalum cerasiferum (syn: Afrosersalisia cerasifera) and Raphia farinifera. Most of these forest patches are now degraded. The bar separating Nabugabo from Lake Victoria is dominated by Vossia cuspidata with Cyperus papyrus, Miscanthidum violaceum and some acidophilic Sphagnum (Stager et al. 2005). Along the bar, there are forest patches dotted in the interfaces between swamps and grasslands. These patches are variable in size and extent of degradation, some intact while others are severely degraded. Some are as small as only 40 m of radius. Common species in these patches include Xylopia aethiopica, Harungana madagscariensis, Beilschimiedia ugandensis, Pseudospondias microcarpa, Alchornea cordifolia, Phoenix reclinata, Bridelia micrantha and Macaranga schweinfurthii. There are also fringes of papyrus along the lake shoreline and swamp forest in others.

Most of Lake Victoria is surrounded by Precambrian bedrock (Johnson et al. 2000). The basement rock is comprised predominantly of granitic metamorphic rocks of the Archaean shield (MWE 2017). The predominant controls on the formation of the Lake Victoria Basin were tectonic uplift and associated rifting around the margins (Rach 1992). Nabugabo and the satellite lakes are natural and are believed to have been originally a bay connected with Lake Victoria. Approximately 3,500 years ago, the lake level fell and the Nabugabo system became separated from Lake Victoria. Further loss of water separated the three lakes from Lake Victoria and left a thin sandbar in between.

The soils in Nabugabo IPA are generally modified by the parent rock through climatic conditions and land use activities. They are mostly ferrallitic and along the lakeshores hydromorphic. The majority of soils were developed from remnants of old lacustrine (lake) deposits. The top soils consist of traces of humus merging into yellow-brown or brown sandy loam or loamy sands to a depth of 3 to 5 ft. The soils are underlain by rounded quartz pebbles and, in some places, with a layer of murram and massive laterite (NARO 2015). The texture is variable from place to place ranging from red laterite, sandy loam and loam, and is in general not very productive. Annual rainfall total is about 1,150 mm in two seasons, March to May and September to December.

Conservation issues

Nabugabo was gazetted as a Ramsar Site in 2004 (MWE 2017). The Ramsar Site covers an extensive wetland system that is interconnected with Lake Victoria, the satellite lakes of Kayugi, Manywa and Kayanja/Birinzi, the Lwera flood plain and the lower catchment of River Katonga (MWE 2017).

Nabugabo is also an Important Bird Area (IBA) with important populations of the Papyrus Gonolek (Laniarius mufumbiri, NT) and the Shoebill (Balaeniceps rex, VU), both of which are Lake Victoria Basin Biome species (Byaruhanga et al. 2001). The two endemic plant species, Senecio navugabensis and Xyris ednae, also trigger a Key Biodiversity Area (KBA) (Plumptre et al. 2019).

As the human population of this area continues to grow and pressure on resources increases, a variety of land uses are now affecting the ecological systems in the area. Large investments have been established in the area including commercial farms, construction of recreational facilities, especially resorts at beaches (NatureUganda 2010), and large-scale extraction of wetland sand and clay. Observable threats to the conservation of biodiversity in this IPA include:
a) unsustainable tree felling for charcoal burning and timber in the forest patches
b) sand mining
c) grazing of cattle
d) burning of vegetation, often associated with refreshing pasture (NatureUganda 2010)
e) illegal fishing, which also puts pressure on plant resources as they are cut for smoking the fish
f) drainage of some areas for cultivation (NatureUganda 2010)
g) expanding recreation and tourism developments
h) alien invasive plants, notably Mimosa pigra and Lantana camara, posing a threat to native flora and habitat quality.

In response to some of these challenges, the Ministry of Water and Environment (2017) in collaboration with the local governments of Masaka, Kalungu, Gomba, Mpigi, and Butambala districts, has developed the Lake Nabugabo wetland system Ramsar Site management plan 2017-2027. The plan envisions, ‘a well-managed Lake Nabugabo wetland system Ramsar site for people’s wellbeing and environment’.

Ecosystem services

The wetland provides habitat for a range of wild fauna and flora including the Papyrus Gonolek (Laniarius mufumbiri) and Shoebill (Balaeniceps rex), which are both globally, threatened (Byaruhanga et al. 2001), and the swamp-restricted Sitatunga (Tragelaphus spekii). There are catfish and mudfish that form an important protein source and livelihood for the surrounding community. Being an important habitat for rare and endangered species such as Sitatunga makes this wetland a unique one that deserves conservation effort. As such, this wetland system was nominated the second Ramsar Site in Uganda after Lake George because of its global significance for the conservation of biodiversity.

The Nabugabo IPA is an important one for biodiversity conservation in this area where a range of human activities including fishing; extraction of herbal medicines, thatching grass, sand, clay, firewood, poles, and water; settlement; hunting; cattle grazing and cultivation are all common (NatureUganda 2020). The IPA plays important roles in provisioning, regulatory, and supporting services in the general landscape, supporting community livelihood and their socio-economic activities. The local communities are mainly engaged in fishing from the Lakes Victoria and Nabugabo.

The nationally threatened habitat of freshwater marshes plays an important function of water filtration, improving water quality for domestic and livestock use. The wetland is critical in controlling the run-off from the surrounding areas. It also acts as a sediment trap, and flood control buffer. Other important services include carbon storage within peat soils, provision of habitat for fish species (particularly as a nursery habitat that supports fisheries), flood prevention, and filtration of water before entering the open water in both Lake Victoria and Nabugabo (Mafabi 2003; Elshehawi 2019).

Site assessor(s)

Assessed by:

James Kalema, Makerere University Herbarium

Kennedy Mukasa, Makerere University Herbarium

Samuel Ojelel, Makerere University Herbarium

Sophie Richards, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew

Date of first assessment: 13th Jan 2025

Reviewed by:

Mary Namaganda, Makerere University

IPA criterion A species

Species Qualifying sub-criterion ≥ 1% of global population ≥ 5% of national population 1 of 5 best sites nationally Entire global population Socio-economically important Abundance at site
Emilia cryptantha C.Jeffrey A(i) True True True False False Unknown
Senecio navugabensis C.Jeffrey A(i) True True True True False Scarce
Vernonia tinctosetosa C.Jeffrey A(i) True True True False False Unknown
Agelanthus entebbensis (Sprague) Polhill & Wiens A(i) True True True False False Unknown
Englerina schubotziana (Engl. & K.Krause) Polhill & Wiens A(i) True True True False False Unknown
Oldenlandia duemmeri S.Moore A(i) True True True False False Common
Xyris ednae Lock A(i) True True True False False Unknown
Baissea leontonori Dilst A(i) True False True False False Unknown

Emilia cryptantha C.Jeffrey

Qualifying sub-criterion:
A(i)
≥ 1% of global population:
True
≥ 5% of national population:
True
1 of 5 best sites nationally:
True
Entire global population:
False
Socio-economically important:
False
Abundance at site:
Unknown

Senecio navugabensis C.Jeffrey

Qualifying sub-criterion:
A(i)
≥ 1% of global population:
True
≥ 5% of national population:
True
1 of 5 best sites nationally:
True
Entire global population:
True
Socio-economically important:
False
Abundance at site:
Scarce

Vernonia tinctosetosa C.Jeffrey

Qualifying sub-criterion:
A(i)
≥ 1% of global population:
True
≥ 5% of national population:
True
1 of 5 best sites nationally:
True
Entire global population:
False
Socio-economically important:
False
Abundance at site:
Unknown

Agelanthus entebbensis (Sprague) Polhill & Wiens

Qualifying sub-criterion:
A(i)
≥ 1% of global population:
True
≥ 5% of national population:
True
1 of 5 best sites nationally:
True
Entire global population:
False
Socio-economically important:
False
Abundance at site:
Unknown

Englerina schubotziana (Engl. & K.Krause) Polhill & Wiens

Qualifying sub-criterion:
A(i)
≥ 1% of global population:
True
≥ 5% of national population:
True
1 of 5 best sites nationally:
True
Entire global population:
False
Socio-economically important:
False
Abundance at site:
Unknown

Oldenlandia duemmeri S.Moore

Qualifying sub-criterion:
A(i)
≥ 1% of global population:
True
≥ 5% of national population:
True
1 of 5 best sites nationally:
True
Entire global population:
False
Socio-economically important:
False
Abundance at site:
Common

Xyris ednae Lock

Qualifying sub-criterion:
A(i)
≥ 1% of global population:
True
≥ 5% of national population:
True
1 of 5 best sites nationally:
True
Entire global population:
False
Socio-economically important:
False
Abundance at site:
Unknown

Baissea leontonori Dilst

Qualifying sub-criterion:
A(i)
≥ 1% of global population:
True
≥ 5% of national population:
False
1 of 5 best sites nationally:
True
Entire global population:
False
Socio-economically important:
False
Abundance at site:
Unknown

IPA criterion C qualifying habitats

Habitat Qualifying sub-criterion ≥ 5% of national resource ≥ 10% of national resource 1 of 5 best sites nationally Areal coverage at site
Freshwater marshes (VU) C(iii) False False True 94.8
Medium Altitude Evergreen Forest (VU) C(iii) False False False 3
Medium Altitude Semi-Deciduous Forest (EN) C(iii) False False False 17.5

Freshwater marshes (VU)

Qualifying sub-criterion:
C(iii)
≥ 5% of national resource:
False
≥ 10% of national resource:
False
Areal coverage at site:
94.8

Medium Altitude Evergreen Forest (VU)

Qualifying sub-criterion:
C(iii)
≥ 5% of national resource:
False
≥ 10% of national resource:
False
Areal coverage at site:
3

Medium Altitude Semi-Deciduous Forest (EN)

Qualifying sub-criterion:
C(iii)
≥ 5% of national resource:
False
≥ 10% of national resource:
False
Areal coverage at site:
17.5

General site habitats

General site habitat Percent coverage Importance
Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland Forest No value Minor
Grassland - Subtropical/Tropical Dry Lowland Grassland No value Major
Grassland - Subtropical/Tropical Seasonally Wet/Flooded Lowland Grassland No value Major
Wetlands (inland) - Permanent Rivers, Streams, Creeks [includes waterfalls] No value Minor
Wetlands (inland) - Seasonal/Intermittent/Irregular Rivers, Streams, Creeks No value Minor
Wetlands (inland) - Bogs, Marshes, Swamps, Fens, Peatlands [generally over 8 ha] No value Major
Wetlands (inland) - Permanent Freshwater Lakes [over 8 ha] No value Major
Wetlands (inland) - Seasonal/Intermittent Freshwater Marshes/Pools [under 8 ha] No value Minor
Wetlands (inland) - Permanent Freshwater Marshes/Pools [under 8 ha] No value Major

Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland Forest

Percent coverage:
No value
Importance:
Minor

Grassland - Subtropical/Tropical Dry Lowland Grassland

Percent coverage:
No value
Importance:
Major

Grassland - Subtropical/Tropical Seasonally Wet/Flooded Lowland Grassland

Percent coverage:
No value
Importance:
Major

Wetlands (inland) - Permanent Rivers, Streams, Creeks [includes waterfalls]

Percent coverage:
No value
Importance:
Minor

Wetlands (inland) - Seasonal/Intermittent/Irregular Rivers, Streams, Creeks

Percent coverage:
No value
Importance:
Minor

Wetlands (inland) - Bogs, Marshes, Swamps, Fens, Peatlands [generally over 8 ha]

Percent coverage:
No value
Importance:
Major

Wetlands (inland) - Permanent Freshwater Lakes [over 8 ha]

Percent coverage:
No value
Importance:
Major

Wetlands (inland) - Seasonal/Intermittent Freshwater Marshes/Pools [under 8 ha]

Percent coverage:
No value
Importance:
Minor

Wetlands (inland) - Permanent Freshwater Marshes/Pools [under 8 ha]

Percent coverage:
No value
Importance:
Major

Land use types

Land use type Percent coverage Importance
Nature conservation No value Major
Forestry No value Minor
Agriculture (arable) No value Minor
Tourism / Recreation No value Minor
Harvesting of wild resources No value Minor
Extractive industry No value Minor

Nature conservation

Percent coverage:
No value
Importance:
Major

Forestry

Percent coverage:
No value
Importance:
Minor

Agriculture (arable)

Percent coverage:
No value
Importance:
Minor

Tourism / Recreation

Percent coverage:
No value
Importance:
Minor

Harvesting of wild resources

Percent coverage:
No value
Importance:
Minor

Extractive industry

Percent coverage:
No value
Importance:
Minor

Threats

Threat Severity Timing
Residential & commercial development - Tourism & recreation areas Low Ongoing - increasing
Agriculture & aquaculture - Annual & perennial non-timber crops - Small-holder farming Low Ongoing - increasing
Agriculture & aquaculture - Livestock farming & ranching - Small-holder grazing, ranching or farming Medium Ongoing - increasing
Transportation & service corridors - Roads & railroads Medium Ongoing - stable
Transportation & service corridors - Utility & service lines Medium Ongoing - increasing
Biological resource use - Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals Low Ongoing - increasing
Human intrusions & disturbance - Recreational activities Low Ongoing - increasing
Human intrusions & disturbance - War, civil unrest & military exercises Low Ongoing - stable
Natural system modifications - Fire & fire suppression - Increase in fire frequency/intensity Low Ongoing - stable
Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseases - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseases Low Ongoing - increasing
Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseases - Problematic native species/diseases Low Ongoing - stable
Biological resource use - Gathering terrestrial plants Medium Ongoing - increasing
Biological resource use - Logging & wood harvesting Medium Ongoing - increasing
Biological resource use - Fishing & harvesting aquatic resources Medium Ongoing - increasing

Residential & commercial development - Tourism & recreation areas

Severity:
Low
Timing:
Ongoing - increasing

Agriculture & aquaculture - Annual & perennial non-timber crops - Small-holder farming

Severity:
Low
Timing:
Ongoing - increasing

Agriculture & aquaculture - Livestock farming & ranching - Small-holder grazing, ranching or farming

Severity:
Medium
Timing:
Ongoing - increasing

Transportation & service corridors - Roads & railroads

Severity:
Medium
Timing:
Ongoing - stable

Transportation & service corridors - Utility & service lines

Severity:
Medium
Timing:
Ongoing - increasing

Biological resource use - Hunting & collecting terrestrial animals

Severity:
Low
Timing:
Ongoing - increasing

Human intrusions & disturbance - Recreational activities

Severity:
Low
Timing:
Ongoing - increasing

Human intrusions & disturbance - War, civil unrest & military exercises

Severity:
Low
Timing:
Ongoing - stable

Natural system modifications - Fire & fire suppression - Increase in fire frequency/intensity

Severity:
Low
Timing:
Ongoing - stable

Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseases - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseases

Severity:
Low
Timing:
Ongoing - increasing

Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseases - Problematic native species/diseases

Severity:
Low
Timing:
Ongoing - stable

Biological resource use - Gathering terrestrial plants

Severity:
Medium
Timing:
Ongoing - increasing

Biological resource use - Logging & wood harvesting

Severity:
Medium
Timing:
Ongoing - increasing

Biological resource use - Fishing & harvesting aquatic resources

Severity:
Medium
Timing:
Ongoing - increasing

Protected areas

Protected area name Protected area type Relationship with IPA Areal overlap
Lake Nabugabo wetland system Ramsar site protected/conservation area encompasses IPA 219
Kisasa Forest Reserve (conservation) IPA encompasses protected/conservation area 3
Manwa Forest Reserve (conservation) protected/conservation area overlaps with IPA 1

Lake Nabugabo wetland system

Protected area type:
Ramsar site
Relationship with IPA:
protected/conservation area encompasses IPA
Areal overlap:
219

Kisasa

Protected area type:
Forest Reserve (conservation)
Relationship with IPA:
IPA encompasses protected/conservation area
Areal overlap:
3

Manwa

Protected area type:
Forest Reserve (conservation)
Relationship with IPA:
protected/conservation area overlaps with IPA
Areal overlap:
1

Conservation designation

Designation name Protected area Relationship with IPA Areal overlap
Lake Nabugabo wetland system Key Biodiversity Area protected/conservation area matches IPA No value
Nabugabo wetland Important Bird Area protected/conservation area matches IPA No value

Lake Nabugabo wetland system

Protected area:
Key Biodiversity Area
Relationship with IPA:
protected/conservation area matches IPA
Areal overlap:
No value

Nabugabo wetland

Protected area:
Important Bird Area
Relationship with IPA:
protected/conservation area matches IPA
Areal overlap:
No value

Management type

Management type Description Year started Year finished
Site management plan in place Lake Nabugabo wetland system Ramsar site Management plan 2017 2027

Site management plan in place

Lake Nabugabo wetland system Ramsar site Management plan
Year started:
2017
Year finished:
2027

Bibliography

Plumptre, A. J., Ayebare, S., Behangana, M., Forrest, T. G., Hatanga, P., Kabuye, C., Kirunda, B., Kityo, R., Mugabe, H., Namaganda, M., Nampindo, S., Nangendo, G., Nkuutu, D. N., Pomeroy, D., Tushabe, H. & Prinsloo, S., 2019

Conservation of vertebrates and plants in Uganda: Identifying Key Biodiversity Areas and other sites of national importance

Conservation Science and Practice, Vol 1, page(s) 1-12 Available online

Richards, S., Kalema, J., Ojelel, S., Williams, J. & Darbyshire, I., 2024

Improving the application of Important Plant Areas to conserve threatened habitats: A case study of Uganda

Conservation Science and Practice, page(s) e13246

Kalema, J., Namaganda, M., Bbosa, G., & Ogwal-Okeng, J., 2016

Diversity and status of carnivorous plants in Uganda: towards identification of sites most critical for their conservation

Available online

Kalema, J., 2005

Diversity and distribution of vascular plants in wetland and savanna Important Bird Areas of Uganda.

Byaruhanga, A., Kasoma, P & Pomeroy, D., 2001

Important Bird Areas in Uganda.

Available online

Beentje, H. J., Fischer, E., Kabuye, C., Kalema, J., Kayombo, C., Luke, W. R. Q., Nshutiyayesu, S. & Ntore, S., 2019

Xyris ednae (errata version published in 2021). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019: e.T103647830A201258128.

Elshehawi, S., Barthelmes, A., Beer, F. & Joosten, H., 2019

Assessment of Carbon (CO2) emissions avoidance potential from the Nile Basin peatlands. Technical Report.

Available online

Gereau, R., Beentje, H. J., Kabuye, C., Kalema, J., Luke, W. R. Q., Maunder, M., Mwangoka, M., Nshutiyayesu, S. & Ntore, S., 2017

Emilia cryptantha. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017: e.T97239339A97239356.

Gereau, R., Beentje, H. J., Kabuye, C., Luke, W. R. Q., Nshutiyayesu, S. & Ntore, S., 2019

Englerina schubotziana. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019: e.T111320061A111320111.

IUCN SSC East African Plants Red List Authority, 2013

Senecio navugabensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2013: e.T47347757A47347760.

Johnson, T. C., Kelts, K. & Odada, E., 2000

The Holocene history of Lake Victoria.

Ambio, Vol 29, page(s) 2-11

Kalema, J., 2005b

The significance of Nabugabo for the conservation of vascular plants.

A compilation of scientific information on Nabugabo Ramsar Site, Uganda. (pub. JOSU Links)

Lye, K. & Namaganda, M., 2005

Rare wetland plants of the Lake Nabugabo area.

A compilation of scientific information on Nabugabo Ramsar Site, Uganda. (pub. JOSU Links)

Mafabi, P., 2003

Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands: Lake Nabugabo wetland system.

Available online

Ministry of Water and Environment [MWE], 1996

The wetland biodiversity inventory report.

Ministry of Water and Environment [MWE], 2017

Lake Nabugabo Wetlands System Ramsar Site Handbook.

Namaganda, M., 2005

Carnivorous plants of the Nabugabo region.

Compilation of scientific information on Nabugabo Ramsar Site, Uganda. (pub. JOSU Links), page(s) 103-108

NatureUganda, 2010

Important Bird Areas in Uganda, Status and Trends Report 2009.

Available online

National Agricultural Research Organization [NARO], 2015

Soil mapping reports for the central region.

Odada, E. O., Olago, D. O. & Ochola, W. [eds.], 2006

Environment for Development: An Ecosystems Assessment of Lake Victoria Basin

Available online

Rach, N. M., 1992

Tectonic Controls on the Lake Victoria Basin.

Basement Tectonics, 7. Proceedings of the International Conferences on Basement Tectonics, vol 1. (pub. Springer)

Ramsar Site Information Service, 2024

Annotated List of Wetlands of International Importance, Uganda.

Available online

Stager, J. C., Westwood, J., Grzesik, D. & Cumming, B. F., 2005

A 5500-year environmental history of Lake Nabugabo, Uganda.

Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, Vol 218, page(s) 347-354

van Geest, A. & Coesel, P., 2012

Desmids from Lake Nabugabo (Uganda) and adjacent peat bogs.

Fottea, Vol 12(1), page(s) 95-110 Available online

Wambede, F., 2021

How human activities have destroyed Mpologoma wetland.

Daily Monitor Available online

Recommended citation

James Kalema, Kennedy Mukasa, Samuel Ojelel, Sophie Richards (2025) Tropical Important Plant Areas Explorer: Nabugabo Wetland (Uganda). https://tipas.kew.org/site/nabugabo-wetland/ (Accessed on 14/05/2025)