Mburo

UGATIPA32
Mburo

Country: Uganda

Administrative region: Western (Region)

Central co-ordinates: 0.6291 S, 30.94730 E

Area: 378km²

Qualifying IPA Criteria

A(i)Site contains one or more globally threatened species, B(iii)Site contains an exceptional number of socially, economically or culturally valuable species

IPA assessment rationale

Lake Mburo National Park qualifies as an IPA under criterion A(i) as it supports a globally important population of Rhynchosia crispa, a range-restricted Ugandan endemic species which has been assessed as endangered (EN) (Wheatcroft in press), and Rhipidoglossum bilobatum, a species currently assessed on the IUCN Red List as Vulnerable. It also contains 10% of useful plant species on the national species checklist thus triggering criterion B(iii).

Site description

Lake Mburo National Park (LMNP), the smallest grassland national park in Uganda, covers an area of 378 km2. It is situated in the three districts of Mbarara, Kiruhura and Isingiro in the U2 floristic region, in the southwestern part of Uganda. It is in the drier part of Uganda known as the cattle corridor, which stretches from northern Tanzania through Uganda to Ethiopia (Tweheyo et al. 2012), and is surrounded by livestock ranches (Blösch 2002). It lies along the Kampala–Mbarara road, 40 km east of Mbarara town, and is the park closest to Kampala.

The park has significant populations of wild animals residing on the surrounding public land. Accordingly, a wider Lake Mburo Conservation Area (LMCA) is recognized that includes both the core LMNP and adjoining parishes, recognizing the need to work with local communities to achieve conservation goals (UWA 2015; Nyamukuru 2019).

Botanical significance

Lake Mburo IPA is botanically important, with at least 529 species of vascular plants recorded, a number higher than even larger-sized similar habitats in Uganda, owing to diversified vegetation types (Kalema 2005). It is the only protected area where the range-restricted Ugandan endemic species Rhynchosia crispa (EN) is known from (Rotton et al. in press). This species is a decumbent or sometimes erect herb 10-18 cm tall, with several shoots from a woody rootstock (APD 2022). The only other recorded localities for this very rare species are Rushozi Dam and Kashari, Moko Range, also in Ankole region. Its presence at the Rushozi Dam and Kashari sites is from old records of 1957 and 1969 respectively. In the park, the species was first recorded in 2001 from Acacia-Pappea wooded grassland - (Kalema #1765; Kalema 2005). Both Rushozi and Kashari sites now appear to be heavily transformed, hence LMNP is the only secure site and could even be the only extant site for this species. It is assessed as Data Deficient (Contu 2012). Also present in the LMNP IPA is Rhipidoglossum bilobatum, a globally Vulnerable (VU) orchid (Gereau et al. 2019). Known from 8 Ugandan sites but should qualify as >1% global population, possibly >5% national population.

The only known Ugandan record of Equilabium (Plectranthus) longipes is from LMNP, collected in Acacia wooded grassland in 2001 (Kalema #1752; Kalema 2005). This species is otherwise known from Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, Ethiopia and Eritrea (Paton et al. 2009). It is also Uganda’s only known site for Indigofera vicioides subsp. rogersii collected from an open hilltop of Loudetia kagerensis on stoney ground in 2001 (Kalema #1624; Kalema 2005).

Lake Mburo IPA contains 109 (10%) useful plant species on the national species checklist, exceeding the 3% threshold and so triggering criterion B(iii). The site is ranked the 9th most species-rich site for useful plants within the IPA network. It significantly holds the highest number of Crop Wild Relatives (CWR) of all sites (11 spp., 13%), of which 6 species are only found at this site. A total of 40 species are unique to this site within the IPA network, predominantly food (26 spp., 5%) and medicinal (24 spp., 3%) species.

Habitat and geology

The present-day vegetation in LMNP has resulted from a combination of factors, including climate, soil, fire, grazing, construction of cattle kraals and cutting trees for firewood and charcoal, besides other human activities (UWA 2015). Significant changes have resulted from these factors. For example, the grass Cymbopogon nardus is steadily increasing, especially from the north, owing to overgrazing and frequent burning (Ayorekire 1999).

LMNP exhibits a semi-arid savanna climate with minimum annual rainfall ranging from 400 mm in the southeast to 700 mm in the west. The park and its environs are drier than the surrounding region, lying in a rain shadow caused by the Kabula hills (UWA 2015). Rainfall is bimodal, occurring mainly from March to May and between September and November, with an intervening long dry season between May and August and a shorter one from December to February. The mean maximum temperature is ca. 27.5°C and the mean minimum is 15°C (UWA 2015).

LMNP contains a mosaic of habitats including rock outcrops, open grassland (mainly in the flat, wide valleys), wooded grassland, thicket, Acacia woodland, gully and riverine forest, and swamp. This variety of habitats gives it a high diversity of plants and animals for its size (Birdlife International 2023). The savanna grassland forms a continuous community of grass cover with scattered trees, the dominant tree species being Acacia hockii (Kalema 2005,UWA 2015). Acacia hockii has increased in abundance over the years (Nyamukuru et al. 2019), reportedly taking up many areas including well-drained hill sides and low-lying hill tops which were previously much more open and provided good grazing areas for wildlife.

The most dominant vegetation type in this region is Dry Acacia Savanna (Wooded Grassland or Woodland) (Kalema 2005). This largely occurs on the elevated parts of the park. Dominant grass species Cymbopogon nardus, Brachiaria decumbens, Panicum maximum, Hyparrhenia filipendula and Themeda triandra, with the aforementioned Acacia hockii being the dominant tree. There is also Moist Acacia Savanna with Acacia polyacantha the dominant tree, and the main grasses being Chloris gayana, Cymbopogon nardus, Brachiaria decumbens and Panicum maximum. There is also grass Savanna, which is open grassland with only very scattered trees. This vegetation type occurs mainly in the eastern and central parts of the park on the higher elevations with thin soil cover on the hilltops, with Loudetia kagerensis, Sporobolus pyramidalis, Themeda triandra, Hyparrhenia spp., Sporobolus stapfinus and Kyllinga (Cyperus) sp. being dominant. Communities with Impeded Drainage represents a fourth vegetation category found within this IPA (Langdale-Brown et al. 1964). In Mburo, these occur in low-lying areas, and they support the grasses Echinochloa pyramidalis, Leersia hexandra and Cynodon dactylon, often growing with Acacia gerrardii, sometimes growing as woodlands. Fifthly, there are wetlands of Cyperus papyrus Swamp. These line most of the southern border of the park and all the lakes (Kalema 2005). Sporobolus spp., Echinochloa pyramidalis and Cyperus spp. dominate seasonal swamps, while Cyperus papyrus and Typha spp. dominate permanent swamps.

The west of LMNP contains dry gully forests located between interlocking hill spurs. These are dominated by Combretum molle. Narrow belts of riverine forests, about 50 m wide, line the western fringes of Lake Mburo and the River Rwizi (Kamugisha et al. 1997), the dominant trees being Markhamia lutea, Vepris nobilis, Ficus spp. and Phoenix reclinata.

LMNP area is underlain by two major Pre-Cambrian rock systems: an older Basement Complex and a younger Karagwe-Ankolean rock system. These have been overlain, since the Pleistocene, by sediments, mainly swamp deposits and alluvium (Kamugisha et al. 1997). The Basement Complex comprises acidic and highly metamorphosed igneous rocks, principally Pre-Cambrian granites and gneisses (Government of Uganda 1967). The soils are mainly ferrallitic soils of sandy type and occasionally sandy loam soils can be found in valleys. The steep slopes are mainly dominated by laterite soils (Government of Uganda 1967).

Conservation issues

Lake Mburo was gazetted as a National Park in 1986 with an area of 650 km2 which was later reduced to 370 km2 (UWA 2015). Despite the decrease in size, the large animals’ home range did not reduce as they continued migrating into private land, competing with livestock for pasture, water and salt in addition to transmission of diseases and causing crop destruction. This bred human-wildlife conflicts, with communities (Tweheyo et al. 2012, Amanya 2015, Kembabazi et al. 2024), which appear to be increasing despite (some interventions Braczkowski et al. 2020).

The immediate neighbours of the park mostly derive their livelihood from livestock rearing. Many of these have large herds on small pieces of land, with inadequate water resources and grazing pasture. Despite the fact that during the dry season, most of the cattle keepers request to be given permits to access water in the park, they still illegally graze their cattle in the park even when they have been granted excess permits for only water. Many households are moving away from strict dependence on cattle-keeping, with many beginning to adopt a more sedentary form of mixed farming, rearing livestock and also growing some crops (Ayorekire 1999). Animals, notably buffalo and hippo, raid their crops and livestock farms (Tweheyo et al. 2012). Illegal tree felling mainly for firewood and charcoal is also reported as a major threat to biodiversity conservation in this IPA.

Wildfires which are set frequently within and around the park are also reported to be a key challenge to resource conservation in the park as it has been affecting the quality of habitat. The cool fires, arising from low fuel, are believed to lead to the germination and regeneration of Acacia spp., while more frequent fires destroy native seeds leading to the emergence of unpalatable species (UWA 2015). Periodically, fire has been used in LMNP as a management tool to provide fresh forage for wildlife and to avoid outbreaks and spread of uncontrolled wildfires that would even impact park property. However, no fire management plan is in place to guide more appropriate and effective burning practices in the park. The resulting impact of fires in LMNP is believed to have caused the long-term negative ecological changes being experienced.

Acacia hockii is reported to have aggressively invaded previously open spaces affecting animal species abundance and distribution in the park thereby impairing tourism activity. Community groups have been mobilised and engaged to uproot the A. hockey trees and shrubs, but the exercise has been done mechanically and haphazardly with no research and monitoring component to understand the impact of its removal both on flora and fauna (UWA 2015).

Non-native invasive (alien) species also occur within and outside the park. Notable among these is Lantana camara, a notorious shrubby invader known to spread prolifically if not controlled (Barahukwa et al. 2023). Elsewhere, Eichhornia crassipes (water hyacinth) is an invasive water weed that has been sighted along River Rwizi. This has the potential to invade all the lakes within the Lake Mburo ecosystem. There is need for mapping the extent and monitoring the spread of these two invasive species. Pockets of congress weed (Parthenium hysterophorus) has also been reported around the campsites and road tracks and could potentially spread further if not eradicated or controlled.

Lake Mburo qualified as a Key Biodiversity Area KBA), triggered by the occurrence of Red-faced barbet (Lybius rubrifacies), a bird species assessed as Near Threatened (NT) (Plumptre et al. 2017). The Lake Mburo- Nakivale ecosystem is a Ramsar site which is an Important Bird Area, particularly important as a breeding area for the regionally endemic shoebill (Balaeniceps rex, VU) and contains important habitat for the papyrus yellow warbler (Calamonastides gracilirostris, VU). The park also hosts a number of migratory birds both palaearctic and continental birds (BirdLife International 2023). LMNP is the only park with significant populations of impala, eland, topi and Burchell’s zebras in Uganda.

Ecosystem services

Lake Mburo National Park, surrounded by livestock ranches, is a critical biodiversity site in this area of intensive pastoral activity. The park plays an important role in provisioning, regulatory and supporting services in this cattle corridor where water availability is key to community livelihood and their socio-economic activities. Lake Mburo and River Ruizi are pivotal in the provision of water in the general landscape. The wetlands fringing these water bodies play an important function in water filtration, improving water quality for use further downstream.

The Lake Mburo IPA is a reservoir of germplasm for crop wild relatives. It is therefore important for crop breeding programmes and the development of varieties with desirable traits such as drought resistance, especially as global and local climate continues to change. There is some local hunting for bushmeat and harvesting of plants for medicinal purposes. Mystroxylon aethiopicum, known locally as “omuboro”, is a tree believed to have aphrodisiac properties and is much sought after (UWA 2015). This also provides the potential for ecotourism at this IPA.

Site assessor(s)

Assessed by:

Kennedy Mukasa, Makerere University Herbarium

James Kalema, Makerere University Herbarium

Samuel Ojelel, Makerere University Herbarium

Iain Darbyshire, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew

Haley Gladitsch, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew

Florence O'Sullivan, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew

Date of first assessment: 18th Nov 2024

Reviewed by:

Aggrey Rwetsiba, Uganda Wildlife Authority

IPA criterion A species

Species Qualifying sub-criterion ≥ 1% of global population ≥ 5% of national population 1 of 5 best sites nationally Entire global population Socio-economically important Abundance at site
Rhipidoglossum bilobatum (Summerh.) Szlach. & Olszewski A(i) True True True True False Scarce
Rhynchosia crispa Verdc. A(i) True True True False False Scarce

Rhipidoglossum bilobatum (Summerh.) Szlach. & Olszewski

Qualifying sub-criterion:
A(i)
≥ 1% of global population:
True
≥ 5% of national population:
True
1 of 5 best sites nationally:
True
Entire global population:
True
Socio-economically important:
False
Abundance at site:
Scarce

Rhynchosia crispa Verdc.

Qualifying sub-criterion:
A(i)
≥ 1% of global population:
True
≥ 5% of national population:
True
1 of 5 best sites nationally:
True
Entire global population:
False
Socio-economically important:
False
Abundance at site:
Scarce

General site habitats

General site habitat Percent coverage Importance
Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland Forest No value Minor
Savanna - Dry Savanna No value Major
Grassland - Subtropical/Tropical Dry Lowland Grassland No value Major
Wetlands (inland) - Permanent Rivers, Streams, Creeks [includes waterfalls] No value Major
Wetlands (inland) - Seasonal/Intermittent/Irregular Rivers, Streams, Creeks No value Minor
Wetlands (inland) - Permanent Freshwater Marshes/Pools [under 8 ha] No value Major
Rocky Areas - Rocky Areas [e.g. inland cliffs, mountain peaks] No value Minor

Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland Forest

Percent coverage:
No value
Importance:
Minor

Savanna - Dry Savanna

Percent coverage:
No value
Importance:
Major

Grassland - Subtropical/Tropical Dry Lowland Grassland

Percent coverage:
No value
Importance:
Major

Wetlands (inland) - Permanent Rivers, Streams, Creeks [includes waterfalls]

Percent coverage:
No value
Importance:
Major

Wetlands (inland) - Seasonal/Intermittent/Irregular Rivers, Streams, Creeks

Percent coverage:
No value
Importance:
Minor

Wetlands (inland) - Permanent Freshwater Marshes/Pools [under 8 ha]

Percent coverage:
No value
Importance:
Major

Rocky Areas - Rocky Areas [e.g. inland cliffs, mountain peaks]

Percent coverage:
No value
Importance:
Minor

Land use types

Land use type Percent coverage Importance
Nature conservation No value Major
Tourism / Recreation No value Major
Harvesting of wild resources No value Minor

Nature conservation

Percent coverage:
No value
Importance:
Major

Tourism / Recreation

Percent coverage:
No value
Importance:
Major

Harvesting of wild resources

Percent coverage:
No value
Importance:
Minor

Threats

Threat Severity Timing
Residential & commercial development - Tourism & recreation areas Low Ongoing - increasing
Agriculture & aquaculture - Livestock farming & ranching - Small-holder grazing, ranching or farming Medium Ongoing - increasing
Transportation & service corridors - Roads & railroads Low Ongoing - stable
Transportation & service corridors - Utility & service lines Low Ongoing - stable
Biological resource use - Gathering terrestrial plants Low Ongoing - increasing
Biological resource use - Logging & wood harvesting Low Ongoing - increasing
Human intrusions & disturbance - Recreational activities Low Ongoing - increasing
Natural system modifications - Fire & fire suppression - Increase in fire frequency/intensity Medium Ongoing - increasing
Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseases - Problematic native species/diseases - Named species Medium Ongoing - increasing

Residential & commercial development - Tourism & recreation areas

Severity:
Low
Timing:
Ongoing - increasing

Agriculture & aquaculture - Livestock farming & ranching - Small-holder grazing, ranching or farming

Severity:
Medium
Timing:
Ongoing - increasing

Transportation & service corridors - Roads & railroads

Severity:
Low
Timing:
Ongoing - stable

Transportation & service corridors - Utility & service lines

Severity:
Low
Timing:
Ongoing - stable

Biological resource use - Gathering terrestrial plants

Severity:
Low
Timing:
Ongoing - increasing

Biological resource use - Logging & wood harvesting

Severity:
Low
Timing:
Ongoing - increasing

Human intrusions & disturbance - Recreational activities

Severity:
Low
Timing:
Ongoing - increasing

Natural system modifications - Fire & fire suppression - Increase in fire frequency/intensity

Severity:
Medium
Timing:
Ongoing - increasing

Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseases - Problematic native species/diseases - Named species

Severity:
Medium
Timing:
Ongoing - increasing

Protected areas

Protected area name Protected area type Relationship with IPA Areal overlap
Lake Mburo National Park National Park protected/conservation area overlaps with IPA 341

Lake Mburo National Park

Protected area type:
National Park
Relationship with IPA:
protected/conservation area overlaps with IPA
Areal overlap:
341

Conservation designation

Designation name Protected area Relationship with IPA Areal overlap
Lake Mburo National Park Key Biodiversity Area IPA encompasses protected/conservation area 336
Lake Mburo National Park Important Bird Area IPA encompasses protected/conservation area 336

Lake Mburo National Park

Protected area:
Key Biodiversity Area
Relationship with IPA:
IPA encompasses protected/conservation area
Areal overlap:
336

Lake Mburo National Park

Protected area:
Important Bird Area
Relationship with IPA:
IPA encompasses protected/conservation area
Areal overlap:
336

Management type

Management type Description Year started Year finished
Site management plan in place UWA (2015). Lake Mburo Conservation Area - General Management Plan (2015 - 2025). 2015 2025

Site management plan in place

UWA (2015). Lake Mburo Conservation Area - General Management Plan (2015 - 2025).
Year started:
2015
Year finished:
2025

Bibliography

Plumptre, A. J., Ayebare, S., Pomeroy, D., Tushabe, H., Nangendo, G., Mugabe, H., Kirunda, B. & Nampindo, S., 2017

Conserving Uganda’s Biodiversity: Identifying critical sites for threatened species. Unpublished Report to USAID and Ministry of Tourism, Wildlife and Antiquities

Langdale-Brown, I., Osmaston, H. A., & Wilson, J. G., 1964

The Vegetation of Uganda and its Bearing on Land-Use

Kalema, J., 2005

Diversity and distribution of vascular plants in wetland and savanna Important Bird Areas of Uganda.

APD 2022, 2022

African Plants Database

Available online

Amanya, I., 2015

Land use types, human practices and their effects on wildlife habitats around Lake Mburo National Park Kiruhuura District, Uganda

BSc dissertation, Nkumba University

Ayorekire, J., 1999

Conflicting land use in and around lake Mburo national park, Sanga sub-county, Mbarara District.

Economics and Finance Available online

Barahukwa, A., Chapman, C.A., Namaganda, M., Eilu, G., Omeja, P., Lawes, M.J., 2023

The effects of the invasive species, Lantana camara, on regeneration of an African rainforest.

Afr J Ecol., Vol 61, page(s) 451–460

BirdLife International, 2023

Important Bird Area factsheet: Lake Mburo National Park

Available online

Blösch, U., 2002

The Dynamics of Thicket Clumps in the Kagera Savanna Landscape, East Africa.

PhD Thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich

Braczkowski, A., Fattebert, J., Schenk, R., O'Bryan, C., Biggs, D., & Maron, M., 2020

Evidence for increasing human- wildlife conflict despite a financial compensation scheme on the edge of a Ugandan National Park. Conservation Science and Practice, A Journal

Contu, S., 2012

. Rhynchosia crispa. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2012: e.T19893081A20134422.

Gereau, R., Beentje, H.J., Kabuye, C., Luke, W.R.Q., Nshutiyayesu, S. & Ntore, S., 2019

Rhipidoglossum bilobatum. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019: e.T111325579A111325584.

Government of Uganda, 1967

Uganda Atlas

Kamugisha, J.R., Ogutu, Z., Stahl, M., 1997

Parks and people: Conservation and livelihood at crossroads. Four case studies from Kenya and Uganda.

Kembabazi, I., Ssenfuma, R., Twinamatsiko, M., Muchunguzi, C., Tinkasimire, R. & Nuwagira, P., 2024

Assessment of the Efficiency of Problematic Animal Interventions in Mitigating Human-Wildlife Conflicts in Uganda: A Case Study of Lake Mburo National Park.

International Journal of Advanced Research, Vol 7(1), page(s) 231-243

,

Lake Mburo-Nakivali Wetland System is a Ramsar Site (Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS)

Nyamukuru, A., 2019

Wild mammal dung abundance in Lake Mburo National Park is lower than in adjacent ranchlands

Nature Conservation, Vol 37, page(s) 123–131

Nyamukuru, A. Grytnes, J-A., Tabuti, J.R.S., & Totland, Ø., 2019

Unfenced Borders Cause Differences in Vegetation and Fauna Between Protected and Unprotected Areas in a Tropical Savanna

Tropical Conservation Science, Vol 12, page(s) 1-12

Paton, A.J., Bramley, G., Ryding, O., Polhill, R., Harvey, Y., Iwarsson, M., Willis, F., Phillipson, P., Balkwill, K., Lukhoba, C., Otiend, D., Harley, 2009

Flora of Tropical East Africa: Lamiaceae (Labiatae)

Tweheyo, T., Tumusiime, D.M., Turyahabwe, N., Asiimwe, A., Orikiriza, L., 2012

Wildlife damage and control methods around Lake Mburo National Park, Uganda. International Journal of Pest Management

International Journal of Pest Management, Vol 58(1), page(s) 25–31

UWA, 2015

Lake Mburo Conservation Area - General Management Plan (2015 - 2025).

Wheatcroft, H., in press

Rhynchosia crispa. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.

Recommended citation

Kennedy Mukasa, James Kalema, Samuel Ojelel, Iain Darbyshire, Haley Gladitsch, Florence O'Sullivan (2025) Tropical Important Plant Areas Explorer: Mburo (Uganda). https://tipas.kew.org/site/mburo/ (Accessed on 14/05/2025)