Mabamba-Mpanga

UGATIPA27
Mabamba-Mpanga

Country: Uganda

Administrative region: Central (Region)

Central co-ordinates: 0.07859 N, 32.30265 E

Area: 142km²

Qualifying IPA Criteria

A(i)Site contains one or more globally threatened species, C(iii)Site contains nationally threatened or restricted habitat or vegetation types, AND/OR habitats that have severely declined in extent nationally

IPA assessment rationale

Mabamba-Mpanga qualifies as an IPA under criterion A(i) as one of the only sites nationally for the globally Endangered species Aldrovanda vesiculosa and an important site nationally for the globally Vulnerable Cnestis mildbraedii and Entandrophragma utile. Moreover, it qualifies under C(iii) as one of the best sites for nationally Vulnerable habitat freshwater marshes. This ecosystem provides numerous valuable ecosystem services and sustainable usage will protect the livelihoods associated with this site in the long-term.

Site description

The Mabamba-Mpanga IPA is located across Mpigi and Wakiso Districts of the Central Region of Uganda where the Katonga River reaches Lake Victoria. The IPA is based largely upon the Mabamba Bay Wetland System Ramsar site, a permanent marsh located on the edge of Lake Victoria, 20 km southwest of Kampala and 10 km west of Entebbe. However, the boundary of the site is modified somewhat from the Ramsar boundary to more accurately reflect the intact wetland system, and the north of the IPA incorporates Mpanga Central Forest Reserve, a small area of intact moist forest lying outside the Ramsar site. The IPA is crossed in the north by the main Kampala-Masaka road near to Mpigi town.

Botanical significance

The Mabamba Bay Wetland System is an important example of the nationally Vulnerable habitat, freshwater marsh. According to the Ministry of Water and Environment, wetlands are under significant pressure nationally and are estimated to have declined from 17.5% national coverage in the 1990s to 8.5% by 2021 (Wambede, 2021). Other wetlands, such as the Mpologoma freshwater marsh near Lake Kyoga, have been degraded due to land shortages and resulting agricultural encroachment, particularly rice farming (Bunyangha et al. 2022). Increased flooding in the Mpologoma area has been linked to this agricultural encroachment (Wambede, 2021). Conservation of the freshwater marsh within Mabamba Bay is, therefore, of great importance in order to avoid the loss of flood mitigation and many other crucial ecosystem services provided by wetland habitats (see Key ecosystem services).

There is also one globally threatened species known from the Ramsar site, the waterwheel (Aldrovanda vesiculosa) which is assessed as Endangered. While this carnivorous aquatic species is wide ranging, native to parts of Africa, Asia, Australia and Asia, it is threatened by expansion of agriculture, pollution and hydrological changes, including freshwater drainage (Cross & Adamec, 2020). Aldrovanda vesiculosa is also threatened nationally by swamp reclamation for agriculture and was therefore assessed as nationally Endangered due to a decline in its range (Kalema et al. 2016). Mabamba Bay is one of only three sites in Uganda from which this species is known and is therefore crucial to its conservation nationally. Furthermore, although not threatened or range restricted, Leersia friesii, a very uncommon grass species in Uganda, is only known from Mabamba Bay and around two satellite lakes near Nabugabo and is locally rare in all three localities (Kalema, 2005).

Mpanga Central Forest Reserve (CFR) is a small (453 ha) but important area of intact Medium Altitude Moist Forest, with over 200 tree and shrub species documented to date (Lwanga 1996), including three threatened tree species, namely Cnestis mildbraedii (VU), Entandrophragma cylindricum (VU) and E. utile (VU).

Habitat and geology

The Mabamba Bay Wetland System is dominated by the grass Miscanthus violaceus (Miscanthidium violaceum), while the edges are largely composed of Cyperus papyrus (Byaruhanga & Kigoolo, 2005). In narrow channels of open water, species such as the waterlily Nymphaea nouchali var. caerulea and the sedge Cladium mariscus are frequent (Ministry of Water and Environment, 2015).

The edges of this wetland would previously have had areas of Piptadeniastrum-Albizia-Celtis forest, as noted in several areas by Langdale-Brown et al. (1964). However, very little of this forest remains and the many, small forest reserves and non-protected forests situated at the fringes of the wetlands appear to now encompass Eucalyptus plantations (Google Earth, 2023; Jones, 2021). A significant exception is the Mpanga CFR which still holds intact moist medium altitude mixed forest with Albizia, Antiaris, Celtis, Entandrophragma and Lovoa amongst the dominant elements (Taylor et al. 2008). Although mapped as Medium Altitude Evergreen Forest, several semi-deciduous forest indicators are present, such as Celtis spp. (Lwanga 1996).

Conservation issues

The Mabamba Bay Wetland System was designated as a Ramsar site in 2006 and so is accorded legal protection as a conservation area. The site was also recognised as an Important Bird Area (Byaruhanga et al. 2001), due to the important habitat it provides for birds such as the Vulnerable species Shoebill (Balaeniceps rex), and falls within the Katonga River Mouth Key Biodiversity Area, which is triggered by the presence of Ningu (Labeo victorianus) a species of fish endemic to the Lake Victoria Basin (Plumptre et al. 2017).

Despite its importance for both species and ecosystem services, Mabamba Bay faces numerous threats. Several of these are caused by disturbances in the catchment area and wetland shores. Wetland edge agriculture and horticulture, for instance, may be introducing agrochemicals into the waters, changing nutrient levels and ecological dynamics (Byaruhanga & Kigoolo, 2005). Loss and degradation of forest and bush burning may also lead to disruption of water dynamics in the catchment area, soil erosion and siltation of waterways and wetland areas (Zake, 2014). However, this wetland is known to play a role in water filtration, preventing and so there may be some tolerance of increased siltation (Byaruhanga & Kigoolo, 2005; Zake, 2014). The establishment of Eucalyptus plantations at the edge of the wetlands may well also impact the resilience of this ecosystem. There is evidence that Eucalyptus monocultures have lower bird diversity compared to other habitats around Mabamba Bay, however, it is not known whether planting of these trees also impacts the wider ecosystem, for instance, through altering water dynamics (Jones, 2021).

Alongside disturbances adjacent to Mabamba Bay, several threats are occurring within wetland areas. The invasive water hyacinth, Eichhornia crassipes, is present within this IPA. This species is known to outcompete other macrophytes (Lake Victoria Basin Commission, 2011) and could impact populations of Endangered Aldrovanda vesiculosa at this site.

Furthermore, prolonged drought periods are causing crops to fail and forcing people to encroach into wetland areas to extract resources (Zake, 2014). Livestock are kept in the wetlands during the dry season, while there has been increased papyrus extraction which is increasingly being used as a source of fuel alongside longstanding uses for fibres and crafts (Byaruhanga & Kigoolo, 2005; Zake, 2014). In addition, illegal sand mining threatens parts of the wetlands. Vegetation mats are cleared to access the substrate and the extracted sand is subsequently used in the construction industry (Nile Basin Initiative, 2022). Alongside threatening the ecosystem, this practice may threaten public health as the sand pits left fill with water and become breeding grounds for mosquitos (Akwetaireho & Getzner, 2010). Further research is needed to better understand how this ecosystem can be used sustainably to support livelihoods in the long term and to what extent ecosystem modifications impact the provision of ecosystem services.

In order to increase the sustainability of local livelihoods, the Lake Victoria Environmental Management Project was initiated between the governments of Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda in the late 1990s. The aims of the project include monitoring water quality, control of invasive water hyacinth and managing fisheries and use of land and wetlands (World Bank, 1996). There have since been three phases of this project, including work with stakeholders at Mabamba Bay on sustainable livelihoods (Akwetaireho & Getzner, 2010; World Bank, 2020). Environment Alert, Nature Uganda, Nature Palace and the Ecological Christian Organization in partnership with Pathfinder International have all been involved in biodiversity conservation initiatives in the area, including promoting sustainable livelihoods, upholding the site’s Ramsar status and raising awareness of conservation issues (Zake, 2014).

Mpanga CFR was established in 1932 and was designated in 1951 as a Research Forest Reserve, with the aim to research the productivity of indigenous forest trees. As such, a permanent 80 x 80 m permanent research plot was established there in 1968 and has been subject to long-term survey (Taylor et al. 2008). The forest suffered from pit-sawing of timber trees prior to the 1950s but showed significant regeneration up to the 1990s. Since that time, increasing demand for timber for wood-carving and construction, heightened by proximity to the Kampala-Masaka road, has led to increased illegal logging within Mpanga (Taylor et al. 2008).

Ecosystem services

Mabamba Bay is a key area for ecosystem service provision. The area is a critical breeding ground and nursery for fish that later migrate into Lake Victoria. Lake Victoria accounts for 58% of Uganda’s fish catch while the fishing activities at the five landing sites operated within the Mabamba Bay area were valued at 561,088 USD in 2008 (Akwetaireho & Getzner, 2010). Arable farming on the fridges of Mabamba Bay relies upon water supply from the wetlands and is also supplemented by nutrients from the marsh. Livestock farmers also depend on pasture, fodder and water collected from the site and, in the dry season, fishing communities keep livestock in the wetlands (Byaruhanga & Kigoolo, 2005). The site also provides a source of drinking water for people, fuelwood and materials. Papyrus is particularly important and is used as material in crafts and, more recently, has been harvested as a fuel source, possibly due to a scarcity of fuelwood (Byaruhanga & Kigoolo, 2005; Zake, 2014). Sand mining takes place at this site, although this activity is prohibited (see Conservation issues). It was estimated by Akwetaireho & Getzner (2010) that the wetland provides an annual 130 USD per capita for the local community through ecosystem services (Akwetaireho & Getzner, 2010).

Mabamba Bay is of cultural significance to the Mamba (lungfish) clan of Buganda Kingdom (Lake Victoria Basin Commission, 2011). There is also tourism in the area, aided by the site’s proximity to Kampala, particularly birdwatching to see the iconic and threatened Shoebill (Balaeniceps rex). Ecotourism, including forest trails, is also established at Mpanga Forest.

The IPA is important for carbon storage and, although there are no estimates yet for the volume of carbon stored within these wetlands, the site has peat soils which are known to be highly effective carbon stores (Elshehawi et al. 2019). The wetland vegetation is also important for filtering sediments from the water before it enters Lake Victoria and stabilising soils (Nile Basin Initiative, 2022). The ecosystem is likely also important in moderation of extreme events, particularly flooding.

Site assessor(s)

Assessed by:

Sophie Richards, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew

Iain Darbyshire, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew

Samuel Ojelel, Makerere University Herbarium

James Kalema, Makerere University Herbarium

Date of first assessment: 4th Nov 2024

Reviewed by:

Micheal Kibuule, Nature Uganda

IPA criterion A species

Species Qualifying sub-criterion ≥ 1% of global population ≥ 5% of national population 1 of 5 best sites nationally Entire global population Socio-economically important Abundance at site
Aldrovanda vesiculosa L. A(i) False False True False False Unknown
Cnestis mildbraedii Gilg A(i) True False True False False Unknown
Entandrophragma cylindricum (Sprague) Sprague A(i) False False False False False Occasional
Entandrophragma utile (Dawe & Sprague) Sprague A(i) False False True False False Occasional

Aldrovanda vesiculosa L.

Qualifying sub-criterion:
A(i)
≥ 1% of global population:
False
≥ 5% of national population:
False
1 of 5 best sites nationally:
True
Entire global population:
False
Socio-economically important:
False
Abundance at site:
Unknown

Cnestis mildbraedii Gilg

Qualifying sub-criterion:
A(i)
≥ 1% of global population:
True
≥ 5% of national population:
False
1 of 5 best sites nationally:
True
Entire global population:
False
Socio-economically important:
False
Abundance at site:
Unknown

Entandrophragma cylindricum (Sprague) Sprague

Qualifying sub-criterion:
A(i)
≥ 1% of global population:
False
≥ 5% of national population:
False
1 of 5 best sites nationally:
False
Entire global population:
False
Socio-economically important:
False
Abundance at site:
Occasional

Entandrophragma utile (Dawe & Sprague) Sprague

Qualifying sub-criterion:
A(i)
≥ 1% of global population:
False
≥ 5% of national population:
False
1 of 5 best sites nationally:
True
Entire global population:
False
Socio-economically important:
False
Abundance at site:
Occasional

IPA criterion C qualifying habitats

Habitat Qualifying sub-criterion ≥ 5% of national resource ≥ 10% of national resource 1 of 5 best sites nationally Areal coverage at site
Freshwater marshes (VU) C(iii) False False True 93.3
Medium Altitude Evergreen Forest (VU) C(iii) False False False 25

Freshwater marshes (VU)

Qualifying sub-criterion:
C(iii)
≥ 5% of national resource:
False
≥ 10% of national resource:
False
Areal coverage at site:
93.3

Medium Altitude Evergreen Forest (VU)

Qualifying sub-criterion:
C(iii)
≥ 5% of national resource:
False
≥ 10% of national resource:
False
Areal coverage at site:
25

General site habitats

General site habitat Percent coverage Importance
Wetlands (inland) - Bogs, Marshes, Swamps, Fens, Peatlands [generally over 8 ha] No value Major
Wetlands (inland) - Permanent Rivers, Streams, Creeks [includes waterfalls] No value Minor
Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland Forest No value Minor

Wetlands (inland) - Bogs, Marshes, Swamps, Fens, Peatlands [generally over 8 ha]

Percent coverage:
No value
Importance:
Major

Wetlands (inland) - Permanent Rivers, Streams, Creeks [includes waterfalls]

Percent coverage:
No value
Importance:
Minor

Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland Forest

Percent coverage:
No value
Importance:
Minor

Land use types

Land use type Percent coverage Importance
Nature conservation No value Major
Agriculture (aquatic) No value Minor
Agriculture (pastoral) No value Minor
Harvesting of wild resources No value Major
Tourism / Recreation No value Minor
Extractive industry No value Minor

Nature conservation

Percent coverage:
No value
Importance:
Major

Agriculture (aquatic)

Percent coverage:
No value
Importance:
Minor

Agriculture (pastoral)

Percent coverage:
No value
Importance:
Minor

Harvesting of wild resources

Percent coverage:
No value
Importance:
Major

Tourism / Recreation

Percent coverage:
No value
Importance:
Minor

Extractive industry

Percent coverage:
No value
Importance:
Minor

Threats

Threat Severity Timing
Agriculture & aquaculture - Annual & perennial non-timber crops - Small-holder farming Medium Ongoing - increasing
Agriculture & aquaculture - Livestock farming & ranching - Small-holder grazing, ranching or farming Low Ongoing - increasing
Energy production & mining - Mining & quarrying Medium Ongoing - increasing
Biological resource use - Logging & wood harvesting Medium Ongoing - increasing
Natural system modifications - Fire & fire suppression - Trend Unknown/Unrecorded Low Ongoing - trend unknown
Climate change & severe weather - Storms & flooding Unknown Ongoing - trend unknown
Pollution - Agricultural & forestry effluents Unknown Ongoing - trend unknown

Agriculture & aquaculture - Annual & perennial non-timber crops - Small-holder farming

Severity:
Medium
Timing:
Ongoing - increasing

Agriculture & aquaculture - Livestock farming & ranching - Small-holder grazing, ranching or farming

Severity:
Low
Timing:
Ongoing - increasing

Energy production & mining - Mining & quarrying

Severity:
Medium
Timing:
Ongoing - increasing

Biological resource use - Logging & wood harvesting

Severity:
Medium
Timing:
Ongoing - increasing

Natural system modifications - Fire & fire suppression - Trend Unknown/Unrecorded

Severity:
Low
Timing:
Ongoing - trend unknown

Climate change & severe weather - Storms & flooding

Severity:
Unknown
Timing:
Ongoing - trend unknown

Pollution - Agricultural & forestry effluents

Severity:
Unknown
Timing:
Ongoing - trend unknown

Protected areas

Protected area name Protected area type Relationship with IPA Areal overlap
Mabamba Bay Wetland System Ramsar site protected/conservation area overlaps with IPA 134
Mpanga Central Forest Reserve Forest Reserve (conservation) IPA encompasses protected/conservation area 5

Mabamba Bay Wetland System

Protected area type:
Ramsar site
Relationship with IPA:
protected/conservation area overlaps with IPA
Areal overlap:
134

Mpanga Central Forest Reserve

Protected area type:
Forest Reserve (conservation)
Relationship with IPA:
IPA encompasses protected/conservation area
Areal overlap:
5

Conservation designation

Designation name Protected area Relationship with IPA Areal overlap
Mabamba Bay Important Bird Area protected/conservation area overlaps with IPA 134
Katonga River Mouth Key Biodiversity Area protected/conservation area overlaps with IPA 134

Mabamba Bay

Protected area:
Important Bird Area
Relationship with IPA:
protected/conservation area overlaps with IPA
Areal overlap:
134

Katonga River Mouth

Protected area:
Key Biodiversity Area
Relationship with IPA:
protected/conservation area overlaps with IPA
Areal overlap:
134

Bibliography

Plumptre, A. J., Ayebare, S., Behangana, M., Forrest, T. G., Hatanga, P., Kabuye, C., Kirunda, B., Kityo, R., Mugabe, H., Namaganda, M., Nampindo, S., Nangendo, G., Nkuutu, D. N., Pomeroy, D., Tushabe, H. & Prinsloo, S., 2019

Conservation of vertebrates and plants in Uganda: Identifying Key Biodiversity Areas and other sites of national importance

Conservation Science and Practice, Vol 1, page(s) 1-12 Available online

Langdale-Brown, I., Osmaston, H. A., & Wilson, J. G., 1964

The Vegetation of Uganda and its Bearing on Land-Use

Google Earth, 2023

Google Earth Pro 2023

Akwetaireho, S., & Getzner, M., 2010

Livelihood dependence on ecosystem services of local residents: A case study from Mabamba Bay wetlands (Lake Victoria, Uganda)

International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and Management, Vol 6, page(s) 75-87 Available online

Bunyangha, J., Muthumbi, A. W. N., Egeru, A., Asiimwe, R., Ulwodi, D. W., Gichuki, N. N. & Majaliwa, M. J. G., 2022

Preferred Attributes for Sustainable Wetland Management in Mpologoma Catchment, Uganda: A Discrete Choice Experiment

Land, Vol 11 Available online

Byaruhanga, A., & Kigoolo, S., 2005

Mabamba Bay Wetland Ramsar Information Sheet

Cross, A. & Adamec, L., 2020

Aldrovanda vesiculosa. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2020: e.T162346A83998419

Available online

Elshehawi, S., Barthelmes, A., Beer, F., & Joosten, H., 2019

Assessment of Carbon (CO2) emissions avoidance potential from the Nile Basin peatlands. Technical Report.

Nile Basin Initiative, 2022

Application of the TEEBAgriFood Evaluation Framework: Scenario analysis of the policies of urban and peri-urban agriculture and wetland restoration of the Mabamba Bay Wetland System, Uganda

Jones, S. M., 2021

Investigating The Impact of Land Use on Avian Diversity and Abundance in Areas Surrounding Mabamba Swamp, Uganda.

Available online

,

The Vascular plants of Nabugabo wetland system. In: H. Busuulwa, P.G. Mafabi & L.M. Ndawula (eds) A compilation of Scientific Information on Nabugabo Ramsar Site, Uganda. Proceedings of the Scientific Conference held at Nabugabo in January 2001

Kalema, J., Namaganda, M., Bbosa, G., & Ogwal-Okeng, J., 2016

Diversity and status of carnivorous plants in Uganda: towards identification of sites most critical for their conservation

Available online

Ministry of Water and Environment, 2015

Uganda wetlands atlas. Volume One: Kampala City, Mukono and Wakiso Districts

Lake Victoria Basin Commission, 2011

A Study on Aquatic Biodiversity in the Lake Victoria Basin. In African Centre for Technology Studies

Wambede, F., 2021

How human activities have destroyed Mpologoma wetland

Daily Monitor Available online

World Bank, 2020

Lake Victoria Environmental Management Project Phase Three

Available online

World Bank, 1996

Implementing Agency World Bank Project Title Lake Victoria Environmental Management Project

Available online

Zake, J., 2014

). Mabamba Wetland System Ramsar Site and its Catchment: Current Challenges and Recommendations for Sustainable Management. Ramsar Secretariat

Available online

Byaruhanga, A., Kasoma, P & Pomeroy, D., 2001

Important Bird Areas in Uganda.

Available online

Lwanga, J., 1996

Trees and Shrubs, in: Mpanga, Zika and Mpigi District Forest Reserves: Biodiversity Report.

Taylor, D., Hamilton, A.C., Lewis, S.L. & Nantale, G., 2008

Thirty-eight years of change in a tropical forest: plot data from Mpanga Forest Reserve, Uganda.

African Journal of Ecology, Vol 46, page(s) 655 – 667

Recommended citation

Sophie Richards, Iain Darbyshire, Samuel Ojelel, James Kalema (2025) Tropical Important Plant Areas Explorer: Mabamba-Mpanga (Uganda). https://tipas.kew.org/site/mabamba-mpanga/ (Accessed on 14/05/2025)