Kidepo Valley – Mount Zulia

UGATIPA22
Kidepo Valley – Mount Zulia

Country: Uganda

Administrative region: Northern (Region)

Central co-ordinates: 4.03769 N, 33.94883 E

Area: 1107.29km²

Qualifying IPA Criteria

A(i)Site contains one or more globally threatened species, C(iii)Site contains nationally threatened or restricted habitat or vegetation types, AND/OR habitats that have severely declined in extent nationally

IPA assessment rationale

Kidepo Valley-Mount Zulia qualifies as an IPA under sub-criterion A(i), due to the presence of threatened taxa Tricalysia bagshawei subsp. bagshawei (VU) and Coffea neoleroyi (EN), the latter species limited only to this IPA nationally. The site also triggers sub-criterion C(iii) as one of the five best sites nationally for both palm wooded grassland and dry Combretum wooded grassland.

Site description

Kidepo Valley-Mount Zulia IPA is located in the most northeasterly corner of Uganda, bordering both Kenya and South Sudan in Karenga District. The IPA includes the extinct volcano Mount Zulia, the surrounding hills and areas of dry Combretum savannah towards the Kidepo Valley including the Kidepo River. Altitudes vary from 887 m north of Mount Zulia towards the border town of Himaan and 2149 m at the peak of Mount Zulia. The hills southeast of Mount Zulia are contiguous with the Didinga hills which extend through Eastern Equatoria in South Sudan and include Mount Lotukei which lies adjacent to Mount Zulia across the border.

Botanical significance

Kidepo Valley-Mount Zulia IPA is of botanical significance as it hosts the only Ugandan population of the Endangered coffee species Coffea neoleroyi (O’Sullivan et al. 2017). This species was previously placed within the genus Psilanthus and was recognised as a coffee species in 2010 (Davis 2010). The species was collected in the foothills of Mount Zulia at around 1,220 m (Wilson #911). Elsewhere, this species is known only from southwest Ethiopia and southeast South Sudan (Davis et al. 2023). Although several of these other localities are within protected areas, Boma National Park in South Sudan and in Ethiopia Maze and Omo National Parks, this species is threatened by habitat degradation through encroachment, burning, illegal gold mining and overgrazing. Threats around Mount Zulia are not well documented and as such this C. neoleroyi was preliminarily assessed as Data Deficient nationally (Davis et al. 2023). Further research is urgently needed around Mount Zulia to quantify the size of the population and any threats.

Another threatened taxon, the Vulnerable subspecies Tricalysia bagshawei subsp. bagshawei, has been recorded from this IPA. Collected at high altitude on Mount Zulia (Wilson #920), this is the northernmost known locality of this Ugandan near-endemic. The Kidepo Valley is also notable as the only site in Uganda for several taxa including Nicolasia nitens, Stylochiton borumensis, Indigofera tenuis and I. vicioides var. rogersii (Kalema & Bukenya-Ziraba 2005).

A single record for the threatened and range-restricted Aloe amudatensis (VU) is known from this site, collected in 1973 (Synnott, T. .J. #1576). This IPA is therefore the only site for A. amudatensis within the IPA network in Uganda. Additional fieldwork should be undertaken to understand the population's extent at this site.

Mount Zulia and the surrounding hills have received little botanical survey effort. Unrest in the Karamoja region and its position at both the South Sudan and Kenya borders, where cattle raids are common, may have limited surveys in this site (Cole 2015). With further survey efforts, we may expect to find taxa such as the range-restricted herb Euphorbia depauperata var. laevicarpa and the Vulnerable tree Prunus africana, both of which have been recorded on neighbouring Mount Lotukei (Friis and Vollesen 1998) only 10 km northwest of Mount Zulia.

Alongside species of conservation importance, this IPA hosts three nationally threatened habitats (Richards et al.¸ in press). Along the Kidepo River is one of the best examples of Palm wooded grassland, accounting for an estimated 7.9% of the national resource and the largest extent within the IPA network. In addition, much of this IPA is dominated by dry Combretum wooded grassland, representing the second largest extent of this habitat within the IPA network (2.43% of the national resource). Finally, the site has small areas of dry Afromontane forest. This habitat is largely limited to the highest ridges of Mount Zulia, and is not extensive enough to trigger criterion C(iii), but it is still of note as it demonstrates the diversity of threatened habitats within this IPA.

Habitat and geology

In the west of this IPA, towards the Kidepo River, are areas of palm wooded grassland, categorised by Borassus aethiopicum and Hyparrhenia grassy understorey, on alluvial soils (Uganda Wildlife Authority 2012). The Kidepo River is a seasonal river which is dries out outside the rainy seasons in April – May and September – November (Inside Kidepo Valley 2024). Much of the IPA is dominated by Combretum-Terminalia wooded grassland mosaic, with denser tree cover in sheltered, hilly areas and on the slopes of Mount Zulia (World Resources Institute 2023). Riverbanks within this woodland habitat, particular among boulders, provide habitat for the rare and Endangered Coffea neoleroyi (Davis et al. 2023).
Mount Zulia itself is a large quartz-syenite intrusion in the surrounding plateau of granitic gneiss (Champion 1937; Scoon 2022). At higher altitudes above around 1800 m, are areas of Afromontane undifferentiated forest, amounting to 92,281 ha (NEMA, UWA, and NFA 2018) although our estimates suggest only 4.44 km2 of forest cover over 40% tree cover. Langdale-Brown (1964) characterise this forest as Juniperus-Podocarpus forest, due to the presence of valuable timber species Juniperus procera and Podocarpus, likely Podocarpus (now Afrocarpus) gracilior. Syzygium sp. (likely S. afromontana which is known from montane forests) is common in the forests of neighbouring Mount Lotukei and may therefore be found in the forests of Mount Zulia. More survey effort is urgently needed to document the species within the entirety of this IPA.
Interestingly, there are records of brackish springs in the vicinity of Mount Zulia (Leeke 1917). We may therefore expect the presence of salt-tolerant species in these areas.

Conservation issues

Zulia was established as a Central Forest Reserve in 1950 while Kidepo Valley National Park, which covers much of the west of the IPA, was initially gazetted as game reserve in 1958 and subsequently upgraded to national park status in 1962 (Achieve Global Safaris 2024). Zulia CFR and Kidepo Valley National Park both fall within the Kidepo Critical Landscape which is subject to UWA management plan (NEMA, UWA, and NFA 2018). Although there are no specific measures for the Zulia area, one of the measures within this plan is to “conduct inventories/assessment of key fauna and flora”. Botanical surveys of Mount Zulia and the surrounding hills would be particularly informative to better guide any conservation actions needed within this IPA.
Kidepo Valley National Park was recognised as an IBA and subsequently a KBA, based on the presence of Vulnerable species Karamoja Apalis (Apalis karamojae) (BirdLife International 2024; Plumptre et al. 2019). The previous Kidepo Valley National Park management plan 2012 – 2022 identified conservation values including the “multiple habitat types” and “endemic plants and fauna” although the latter refers to species only known from this national park in Uganda but are present elsewhere. Key conservation actions that might support sustainable livelihoods and conserve threatened habitats within the IPA include community tree planting, promotion of eco-tourism, regulation of resource extraction including community agreements on sustainable harvesting of medicines and bamboo.
Little is known about the threats to Mount Zulia. Tree cover appears stable (World Resources Institute 2023) and although people live within this IPA, most notably Himaan village at the South Sudan border and Toposa communities on the slopes of Mount Zulia, the site appears to be sparsely populated and there does not appear to be much, if any, further expansion of homesteads or agricultural land (Google Earth 2023). The position of this IPA at the border of two other countries may make migration to this area, particularly of refugees, more likely in the future.

Ecosystem services

The site is an important watershed, including tributaries to the Kidepo River (UWA 2012). The vegetation likely stabilises soils and fixes carbon.
Toposa communities live on the slopes of Mount Zulia (E and J Tourism Consultants 2024), and the IPA may provide important resources for these communities, especially grass for cattle. The collection of non-timber forest products such as foods and medicines has been documented within the site. Timber trees such as Podocarpus/Afrocarpus and Juniperus procera occur at the site, although there is no evidence of harvesting.
There are also tourist opportunities around Kidepo Valley-Mount Zulia, associated with Kidepo Valley National Park, including hiking, camping, and wildlife spotting (E and J Tourism Consultants 2024).

Site assessor(s)

Assessed by:

Sophie Richards, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew

Iain Darbyshire, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew

Samuel Ojelel, Makerere University Herbarium

James Kalema, Makerere University Herbarium

Date of first assessment: 20th Jan 2025

Reviewed by:

Charles Tumwesigye, Uganda Wildlife Authority

IPA criterion A species

Species Qualifying sub-criterion ≥ 1% of global population ≥ 5% of national population 1 of 5 best sites nationally Entire global population Socio-economically important Abundance at site
Coffea neoleroyi A.P.Davis A(i) True True True False True Unknown
Tricalysia bagshawei S.Moore subsp. bagshawei A(i) True False False False False Unknown
Aloe amudatensis Reynolds A(i) True False True False True Unknown

Coffea neoleroyi A.P.Davis

Qualifying sub-criterion:
A(i)
≥ 1% of global population:
True
≥ 5% of national population:
True
1 of 5 best sites nationally:
True
Entire global population:
False
Socio-economically important:
True
Abundance at site:
Unknown

Tricalysia bagshawei S.Moore subsp. bagshawei

Qualifying sub-criterion:
A(i)
≥ 1% of global population:
True
≥ 5% of national population:
False
1 of 5 best sites nationally:
False
Entire global population:
False
Socio-economically important:
False
Abundance at site:
Unknown

Aloe amudatensis Reynolds

Qualifying sub-criterion:
A(i)
≥ 1% of global population:
True
≥ 5% of national population:
False
1 of 5 best sites nationally:
True
Entire global population:
False
Socio-economically important:
True
Abundance at site:
Unknown

IPA criterion C qualifying habitats

Habitat Qualifying sub-criterion ≥ 5% of national resource ≥ 10% of national resource 1 of 5 best sites nationally Areal coverage at site
Afromontane dry forest (CR) C(iii) False False False 4.4
Dry Combretum wooded grassland (VU) C(iii) False False True 572
Palm wooded grassland (EN) C(iii) True False True 82.5

Afromontane dry forest (CR)

Qualifying sub-criterion:
C(iii)
≥ 5% of national resource:
False
≥ 10% of national resource:
False
Areal coverage at site:
4.4

Dry Combretum wooded grassland (VU)

Qualifying sub-criterion:
C(iii)
≥ 5% of national resource:
False
≥ 10% of national resource:
False
Areal coverage at site:
572

Palm wooded grassland (EN)

Qualifying sub-criterion:
C(iii)
≥ 5% of national resource:
True
≥ 10% of national resource:
False
Areal coverage at site:
82.5

General site habitats

General site habitat Percent coverage Importance
Forest No value Minor
Savanna - Moist Savanna No value Minor
Savanna - Dry Savanna No value Major
Wetlands (inland) - Seasonal/Intermittent/Irregular Rivers, Streams, Creeks No value Minor

Forest

Percent coverage:
No value
Importance:
Minor

Savanna - Moist Savanna

Percent coverage:
No value
Importance:
Minor

Savanna - Dry Savanna

Percent coverage:
No value
Importance:
Major

Wetlands (inland) - Seasonal/Intermittent/Irregular Rivers, Streams, Creeks

Percent coverage:
No value
Importance:
Minor

Land use types

Land use type Percent coverage Importance
Nature conservation No value Major

Nature conservation

Percent coverage:
No value
Importance:
Major

Threats

Threat Severity Timing
Agriculture & aquaculture - Annual & perennial non-timber crops - Shifting agriculture Low Ongoing - stable
Agriculture & aquaculture - Livestock farming & ranching - Small-holder grazing, ranching or farming Low Ongoing - stable
Natural system modifications - Fire & fire suppression - Trend Unknown/Unrecorded Unknown Ongoing - trend unknown
Energy production & mining - Mining & quarrying Low Ongoing - stable

Agriculture & aquaculture - Annual & perennial non-timber crops - Shifting agriculture

Severity:
Low
Timing:
Ongoing - stable

Agriculture & aquaculture - Livestock farming & ranching - Small-holder grazing, ranching or farming

Severity:
Low
Timing:
Ongoing - stable

Natural system modifications - Fire & fire suppression - Trend Unknown/Unrecorded

Severity:
Unknown
Timing:
Ongoing - trend unknown

Energy production & mining - Mining & quarrying

Severity:
Low
Timing:
Ongoing - stable

Protected areas

Protected area name Protected area type Relationship with IPA Areal overlap
Kidepo Valley National Park protected/conservation area overlaps with IPA 589
Zulia Forest Reserve (conservation) protected/conservation area overlaps with IPA 926

Kidepo Valley

Protected area type:
National Park
Relationship with IPA:
protected/conservation area overlaps with IPA
Areal overlap:
589

Zulia

Protected area type:
Forest Reserve (conservation)
Relationship with IPA:
protected/conservation area overlaps with IPA
Areal overlap:
926

Conservation designation

Designation name Protected area Relationship with IPA Areal overlap
Kidepo Valley National Park Key Biodiversity Area protected/conservation area overlaps with IPA 589
Kidepo Valley National Park Important Bird Area protected/conservation area overlaps with IPA 589

Kidepo Valley National Park

Protected area:
Key Biodiversity Area
Relationship with IPA:
protected/conservation area overlaps with IPA
Areal overlap:
589

Kidepo Valley National Park

Protected area:
Important Bird Area
Relationship with IPA:
protected/conservation area overlaps with IPA
Areal overlap:
589

Management type

Management type Description Year started Year finished
Site management plan in place Management plan for the wildlife dispersal corridors in the Kidepo critical landscape (Uganda) 2018 2027

Site management plan in place

Management plan for the wildlife dispersal corridors in the Kidepo critical landscape (Uganda)
Year started:
2018
Year finished:
2027

Bibliography

Plumptre, A. J., Ayebare, S., Behangana, M., Forrest, T. G., Hatanga, P., Kabuye, C., Kirunda, B., Kityo, R., Mugabe, H., Namaganda, M., Nampindo, S., Nangendo, G., Nkuutu, D. N., Pomeroy, D., Tushabe, H. & Prinsloo, S., 2019

Conservation of vertebrates and plants in Uganda: Identifying Key Biodiversity Areas and other sites of national importance

Conservation Science and Practice, Vol 1, page(s) 1-12 Available online

Langdale-Brown, I., Osmaston, H. A., & Wilson, J. G., 1964

The Vegetation of Uganda and its Bearing on Land-Use

Google Earth, 2023

Google Earth Pro 2023

World Resources Institute, 2023

Global Forest Watch 2023

Available online

Davis, A.P., Kiwuka, C., Faruk, A., Mulumba, J. & Kalema, J., 2023

A review of the indigenous coffee resources of Uganda and their potential for coffee sector sustainability and development.

Frontiers in Plant Sciences, Vol 13.1057317

Achieve Global Safaris, 2024

History of Kidepo Valley National Park

Kidepo National Park Available online

BirdLife International, 2024

Important Bird Area Factsheet: Kidepo Valley National Park

Available online

Champion, A.M., 1937

Physiography of the Region to the West and South-West of Lake Rudolf

The Geographical Journal, Vol 89, page(s) 97-118 Available online

Davis, A.P., 2010

Six species of Psilanthus transferred to Coffea (Coffeeae, Rubiaceae)

Phytotaxa, Vol 10, page(s) 41-45 Available online

E and J Tourism Consultants, 2024

Mount Zulia

Inside Kidepo Valley National Park Available online

Friis, I. & Villesen, K., 1998

Flora of the Sudan-Uganda border area east of the Nile. Catalogue of vascular plants, 1st part

Biologiske Skrifter 51:1, Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab

NEMA, UWA & NFA, 2018

Management Plan for the Wildlife Dispersal Corridors in the Kidepo Critical Landscape (Uganda) 2018-2027

Scoon, R., 2022

Geological Highlights of East Africa’s National Parks

UWA, 2012

Kidepo Valley National Park General Management Plan 2012-2022

Cole, T. C., 2015

Aloe lukeana: A New, Caulescent Aloe from Uganda

Cactus and Succulent Journal, Vol 87, page(s) 152-159 Available online

O'Sullivan, R.J., Chadburn, H. & Davis, A.P., 2017

Coffea neoleroyi (errata version published in 2020). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017: e.T18290348A176942734

Available online

Kalema, J., and Bukenya-Ziraba, R., 2005

Patterns of Plant Diversity in Uganda

Biologiske Skrifter, Vol 55, page(s) 201-208

Inside Kidepo Valley, 2024

Kidepo River

Available online

Leeke, R. H., 1917

The Northern Territories of the Uganda Protectorate

The Geographical Journal, Vol 49(3), page(s) 201–8

Uganda Wildlife Authority, 2012

Kidepo Valley National Park Management Plan

Available online

Recommended citation

Sophie Richards, Iain Darbyshire, Samuel Ojelel, James Kalema (2025) Tropical Important Plant Areas Explorer: Kidepo Valley - Mount Zulia (Uganda). https://tipas.kew.org/site/kidepo-valley-mount-zulia/ (Accessed on 14/05/2025)